Skip to content
Evaluation

Understanding the practice of evaluation in organizations as a significant experience that not only helps to identify new opportunities but also enables individual growth.

Who evaluates workers today and who they'd prefer in an ideal world?

The current situation

To date, 60% of European workers are evaluated by their direct supervisor.

The desired state

…and they want to keep it this way.

The desired state

But they’d also like to be evaluated from others, like their team members and co-workers.

At what level is performance review more frequently conducted?

Performance review levels in European organizations

A small group of workers currently don’t undergo structured performance measurement.

Performance review levels in European organizations

The majority are evaluated at team level.

Performance review levels in European organizations

About a third of the sample are assessed individually.

Performance review levels in European organizations

Nearly the same amount experiences performance review at department level.

INSIGHT

High talent density

Performance management is evolving, shifting to dynamic systems focused on growth and continuous development. This transformation reflects a deeper understanding of what drives organizational success: not just meeting performance targets but creating an environment where talent thrives and contributes meaningfully to collective goals.

 

Josh Bersin’s “The Myth of The Bell Curve” offers a critical lens for rethinking performance management in this context. Traditional methods, such as the bell curve, assume a uniform distribution of performance across employees. However, these models often lead to a culture of mediocrity, where the majority are labeled “average,” and the unique contributions of high performers are diluted. While, Bersin’s talent density theory, based on the Pareto distribution or Power Law, acknowledges that a small percentage of individuals (20%) drive the majority of results (80%) underscoring the importance of identifying and nurturing these key contributors. To do so, companies should move away from one-size-fits-all assessments, by leveraging AI-powered tools for real-time feedback and bias reduction.

 

Moreover, maintaining high talent density in a growing company requires deliberate hiring strategies. Rather than filling roles reactively, organizations must prioritize candidates who elevate team performance and embody the qualities that drive outsized impact. Performance management systems that emphasize individual development, paired with a commitment to hiring for excellence, create a feedback loop that sustains and amplifies talent density. This new perspective highlights a shift where cultivating extraordinary contributions, ensures that growth is not just about numbers but about amplifying impact.

While performance reviews might be the most common evaluation tool in organizations, how do workers actually feel about them?

The value of performance review as a measurement process

38% of those undergoing performance review do not see value in the process.

The value of performance review as a measurement process

Gen X shows the most skepticism toward performance reviews, followed by Millennials, Gen Z, and Boomer.

The value of performance review as a measurement process

The larger the company, the more performance reviews are called into question: 42% of those who see no value in performance reviews belong to companies with over 501 employees.

The value of performance review as a measurement process

62% do find value in performance reviews.

The value of performance review as a measurement process

44% of those who answered yes, appreciate getting effective tools and suggestions.

The value of performance review as a measurement process

41% of those who answered yes, value the rewards for good performance.

The value of performance review as a measurement process

…and 15% value both aspects.

The value of performance review as a measurement process

Millennials and Gen Z, being more growth-oriented, place almost equal importance on receiving feedback/suggestions and earning concrete rewards.

What's the perception of peer evaluation?

Here's what workers who currently receive peer evaluations have to say

Only 12% of workers currently receive evaluations from their peers.

Here's what workers who currently receive peer evaluations have to say

Those with experience of peer evaluation particularly value feedback from peers.

Here's what workers who currently receive peer evaluations have to say

…rating it even higher than manager feedback.

Past chapter

Next chapters

Discover our research project

alt=

INTERESTED IN MORE?

Pick a channel and start a conversation.